NFL betting is quiet right now, with the Draft still a couple weeks away and a long offseason ahead. That said, it’s never too early to start preparing for futures markets for the 2026–27 season.
Futures betting is where many bettors fall into bad habits. Instead of doing the necessary research, it’s easy to chase “what-if” scenarios or back favorite teams and players based on optimism rather than analysis.
To help avoid those pitfalls, we’re breaking down five of the most common mistakes bettors make when approaching NFL futures. Between injuries, assumptions, and misplaced confidence, there are plenty of ways to get it wrong. With the right approach, those mistakes can be avoided, and long-term value can be found.
Ignoring Injury History/Off-Field Issues
Players like Christian McCaffrey are easy picks for Offensive Player of the Year when viewed through career production. High efficiency, heavy usage, and constant red-zone opportunities make him an obvious candidate based on how he’s deployed.
The issue is availability.
That line of thinking ignores how often injuries can derail a season. Players like McCaffrey, Jayden Daniels, and T.J. Watt all look like award winners when healthy, but that qualifier matters.
Off-field risk creates a similar problem. Some players carry volatility that rarely gets priced into futures markets. Antonio Brown is the extreme example, a perennial talent whose off-field issues made him unreliable as a long-term bet.
There are comparable players without that level of risk. Those are the ones worth backing.
Not Checking Regular Season Schedule
Too many bettors evaluate teams in a vacuum, deciding on win totals based solely on roster talent. It’s one of the most common mistakes in futures betting.
Win totals are not set by talent alone, they’re set by how that talent stacks up against a team’s schedule. Matchups, travel, and overall schedule difficulty all play a role.
If you’re betting season win totals, you need to understand what a team is up against. Relying on raw talent alone is one of the easiest ways to get it wrong.
Banking On ‘Safe’ Teams
Kansas City and Philadelphia were widely seen as “safe” over bets last season, but teams like that often turn into traps. Consistent contenders, and in Kansas City’s case a full-blown dynasty, tend to get priced at their ceiling.
That’s where bettors get complacent.
Teams like the Chiefs are often used to balance out riskier picks, but nothing in the NFL is truly safe. Dynasties age, rosters turn over, and performance regresses, often more predictably than people expect.
Sticking with the example, Kansas City is aging and losing key pieces, while Philadelphia benefited from some unsustainable offensive production and is now dealing with coordinator turnover. These are the types of factors that get overlooked.
If a team were truly a “safe” bet, the market would reflect it. Take the time to evaluate before assuming stability.
Ignoring Rookies’ Team Situations
Offensive and Defensive Rookie of the Year are among the hardest awards to bet. When decisions get difficult, bettors tend to fall back on hype, and it shows up most clearly in rookie futures markets.
Quarterbacks and top running backs usually draw early attention because of projected volume. They’re the easiest path to production, but that doesn’t always translate to value.
Tetairoa McMillan is a good example. He wasn’t viewed as a favorite entering last season, but he stepped into an ideal situation. The Panthers lacked a clear No. 1 receiver, he gave Bryce Young a reliable target, and he played in a system built to feature him.
There will be immediate hype around players like Jeremiyah Love, regardless of landing spot. The smarter approach is to evaluate a player’s situation first, then talent.
Assuming Winners Repeat
Bettors will flock to Seattle overs and Super Bowl futures in droves. It happens every year, with money pouring in on the defending champion, including a $55,000 bet on the Eagles to repeat that surfaced at BetMGM last offseason.
That pattern is unlikely to change this year, but history suggests it rarely pays off.
Dynastic runs from teams like Kansas City and New England have skewed perception, leading bettors to believe champions are more likely to repeat than they actually are. In reality, that outcome is the exception, not the rule.
Since 2000, the Super Bowl winner has repeated only twice. In today’s NFL, with its level of parity, there is no clear candidate to do it again.
If you believe in Seattle, that’s your call. Just understand what the data says before putting money behind it.
If this was your kind of read, you’ll like what’s next. Get The Sandman Ticket, our free, weekly newsletter with picks, insights, and a little bit of everything we love about sports.
